That's Action SBY against Society Reaction
REPUBLIKA.CO.ID, President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono has finally spoken about the case of Gaius Tambunan. A total of 12 instruction issued to all law enforcement agencies completed for the case of Gaius and similar cases do not recur in the future. Is this instruction will be effective? Here's an interview with director Pukat Republika UGM, Zainal Arifin Mochtar:
How do you assess the President's speech about the enforcement of the law?
The speech was a bit revolutionary, there teroboson to work. But, SBY still more to talk about public reaction to cases of Gaius. Other cases what? Supposedly, the government does not just push the case of Gaius. Gaius was a long rolling case, why the new President to speak now? every action there is reaction. To address this time for me interesting.
This is an action against a very strong reaction from the community to be completed by SBY. That is, public pressure is very high. SBY should appear as president, including the prosecution and police.
Least in terms of language, that's encouraging. There are instructions loud and promising. However, if the motive was right, why just done now, it wallahu'alam.
Keep in mind, the Presidential Instruction No. 5 of 2004 (on the Acceleration of Corruption Eradication), it failed. But this time the language is good, clear, ordered. Living there are two obstacles: first, the willingness of the officials who ordered, secondly, the ability of presidents to control who ordered it.
If one of two that do not match, it will be difficult. If subordinates do not want to do, SBY should be able tweaked them. But if subordinates will do, depending on the control of SBY.
Whether it can be said to act SBY late? I'm not talking about late. SBY done is indeed a step that has been long awaited. Steps are already obliged to do SBY new all the time but do now.
However, better late than never prayed the prayer at all. What do SBY already / / on the track / / although considered late, but it's important to do. This is the action of strong reaction from the public.
SBY gives green light for such proof is reversed. Will it be effective to solve the case of Gaius or other legal cases?
Actually stay would be done or not. On anti-money laundering rules, evidentiary tebalik already exists. But it was never used by judges and prosecutors.
President ordered to use this (proof inverted), as long as there are rules but never used. Proof that upside down is an instruction to use. Actual proof of this inverse can be used in a broader case. If you want bold, this means not only translated to money laundering.
The President gave one week's time to dismiss or memutasi officials who indicated to deviate. Sebeapa effective to combat corruption?
It must be clean. Depending want done or not. Depending subordinate SBY, willing to do or not. One week, in my opinion, it can be done. But, like whether or not doing, that's what matters. Then be able not to tweaked SBY who does not want to do. This is a command. The command should be run!
The President asked for peninjaun rule of law has loopholes for disiasati. What must be addressed in terms of fighting corruption?
Lots. In fact, all. It must be from upstream to downstream. Starting from the KPK, prosecution, asset recovery it. Working on improvement of law that need major work. Ends is legislation, to make it into law or government regulations.
Commission of the internal side. Poalan KPK is the law. Witness Protection Act and the victim was also the same. At the central level financial Transaction Reports and Analysis (PPATK) are also similar.
Taxpayer data, which closed the bank also needs to be addressed. Officers who have received permission to examine it also prevents the eradication of corruption and must be addressed. Of this, depending on then, who is doing the job. Who would translate that SBY orders.
So, I see the improvement of law can not be done partially. The building is like building law if one can knock down all withdrawn. If only one or two it can actually potentially bothering not fix. Therefore, should as a whole, should be upstream and downstream. That work simultaneously and time-consuming, but it's important to do.
Related instructions indicated the confiscation of money that Gaius corruption, whether it can actually be realized?
Deprivation is important. That's a lot, which is the decision and must be taken back to this country. Now that should be done, how to maximize the collection of its assets.
That's a big job and already the state's responsibility to conduct and pursue them. I know it's difficult, but it must be done. I believe the sun rises tomorrow.
Obstacles that might happen?
All must have a lot of obstacles. Asset recovery is certainly a lot of obstacles. All insruksi president was also a lot of obstacles. But many problems it is the part that needs to be done.
It could be the misrepresentation of optimism and confidence. If it says are optimistic and believe one hundred percent in SBY, ya do not like it. Optimism is true hope can be realized and criticism do not believe it still exists. I hope that money falls from the sky, yes. But I believe the money falling from the sky, it will not happen.
In handling the case of Gaius, what steps should be taken by the government?
Very much. It's just a case of Gaius, there are many others. Not to mention the talk of law enforcement as a whole. Banyal There are tax mafia, mafia no mining, fishing, logging, and others.
We hope, if we fail in nine battles, at least we never won a single battle. Now that has to do is how to subvert the case of Gaius and later can be expanded to other cases.
Already the extent to which the work of government itself in the case of Gaius?
There are currently no employment. If this performance is actually implemented will be raised. If not implemented, there will be no advancement. In our evaluation in 2010, no significance, the same as last year, just the same, no teroboson. Cases of corruption so-so, too.
If the case remains koruspi so-so, too, there are only two possibilities: first, never could find the cure, secondly, there and know the cure but did not drink it. There was no significant change.
Critique me to SBY that's actually about the KPK that goes into the case of Gaius. The door was opened by SBY, but not very wide. It seems only the prosecutor and the Police forced to surrender it. But Yudhoyono will keep your hearts and police prosecutors.
My notes on the case of Gaius, SBY did not expressly ask for police and prosecutors to open ourselves to the KPK. But precisely the language he is to encourage active KPK it interesting. If prosecutors and kepolisain would translate well, that's good.
Read More ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment